What is your recommendation about integrating “Multispectral Imaging” (the previous name of the MicaToolbox directory in ImageJ) with “micaToolbox” (the new name of the directory included in the download of 2.0)? Is there any problem with adding the contents of “micaToolbox” (from the download of 2.0) into the existing “Multispectral Imaging” directory, or is the recommendation to essentially ‘start-fresh’ by using “micaToolbox” and adapting any custom scripts/macros to the new toolbox? Thanks for the great work and toolkit!

How to best integrate micaToolbox 2.0 with previous versions
Cedric van den Berg Changed status to publish April 11, 2019